|Shoofly module by M.C. Fujiwara|
For those not aware, M.C. Fujiwara of Silicon Valley Free-moN wrote a marvelous article on how to build a shoofly scene in the November 2013 issue of Model Railroad Hobbyist. I great read no matter what scale you model in.
Article and discussion available on the Model Railroad Hobbyist website and here on their discussion forum. http://model-railroad-hobbyist.com/magazine/mrh-2013-11-nov/shoofly-scene
From the looks of it...more to come from Northern California!
Modifying Walthers turnouts is an investment in time but worth the security it brings for operation with DCC. I have to confess that I wrecked the first Walthers turnout I tried to do the DCC friendly conversion to. After learning how to (and how not to) do it, I did OK with all the rest. It takes time and patience, but I liked the result including the fact that I could spread the points farther apart. I also filled the frog with epoxy so that narrower wheels didn't drop so much.
I'll undoubtedly continue doing the conversion in the future. It seems like it would be easy for Walthers/Shinohara to update their design. I suppose they have big money invested in the tooling for the present design, and probably not that many people really care.
|Mike Cougill's excellent book, Detailing Track. OST Publications.|
One thing you run into with the attainable layouts that I advocate is that they are...well....they're attainable. Sooner rather than later you'll have them up and running. I'm seeing abundant proof of that from the photos I receive on a weekly basis. Once you do have a layout that runs reliably, the next step is to pick small sections that catch your fancy and upgrade them, and your modeling skills at the same time. One avenue you can go down, and one I find relaxing is detailing your track. I'm assuming that most of you are using Walthers, Peco, or Atlas flex track to start.
I don't advocate removing massive sections of existing rail at a time. What I do suggest is pulling up eighteen inches or so of tangent track somewhere, perhaps at the end of a spur, and play around with super detailing. Abandoned rail is a common (and seldom modeled) aspect of the rail scene.
I’ve known Trevor Marshall for many years. He’s always been a good modeler. As good as he was when I first saw his work, he’s an even better modeler now. He’s always pushing his own personal limits. Case in point are the photos to the right and below. One of the most difficult skills to master (and most dramatic if you do) is effective ground cover. Note the impact of his newly acquired skills in the images of his recent work. My point is that it’s not so much this
There has been more mental growth within Free-mo to better define tolerances and adhere to them. I am no exception when it comes to finding modules that have areas of track that are hard for finer scale and detailed models to compensate. Some nasty track is pretty intentional as I was after depicting FRA accepted track on a team track. For the most part, that area was very successful. Unfortunately, areas of the Main Line on Furgeson Yard are falling below standard. All this has started the process of how I should fix it or if I should start over fresh and clean, do the job right from the very start.
Digging around in the multitude of electronic gadgetry I take to setups the other day, I rediscovered a few things I forgot I had. Perhaps I'm alone in this, or perhaps...? An elderly DT100 with a broken knob, and a Buddy Throttle, woah remember those? At this point both Digitrax misfits, gone the way of VHS. I found my LocoBuffer still in translucent project box and 25 pin serial connector. The DCS100 and DB150 I have are still going strong although the DCS100 had to be repaired a few years ago. Going through what some may classify as e-trash, I started to wonder, "has DCC fulfilled it's promise for BETTER control of our trains?" With the word "better" meaning also more enjoyment in our niche of modular railroading.
By far the biggest obstacle facing the entry level modeler is overcoming inertia, getting that first layout off the launching pad, and operating reliably. Doing so is an enormous achievement. Things flow much easier after hitting that first milestone. The primary reason I’m an advocate for smaller, simpler layouts going in is that it stacks that odds of success in your favor.
Over the past year I’ve gotten more and more emails and photos of well done first attempts that are up and running. The sense of satisfaction obtained by these modelers is very evident.
Mike Budde of St. Louis, MO, was featured in the November 2007 issue of (the now defunct) Railmodel Journal. For a simple trackplan, this module is really an outstanding example of the principles of Free-mo. Sometimes the mundane details can be overlooked. Mike really accomplishes modeling the out of service spur beautifully. The VW Junkyard demonstrates Mike's incredible eye for detail, and his modeling skill to replicate it.
A thought that this module set gave, and it mirrors what Lance Mindheim discusses in his blog; not every industry needs to have an active spur and currently being serviced by rail. Having a remnant of rail service, foundation of a buisiness now gone, rusty rails burried into dirt, etc. develop a sense of history.
|Lance's manifest power rolls over the Piru bridge.|
Flinging open the car door and disengaging the seatbelt simultaneously, I hurl myself out of the driver's seat. Giving the modules a quick once over from outside the window looking in "WHEW, nothing was damaged!" Making my way inside the setup hall, I find my cohorts, hand on their chins, holding the layout plan with a worried look on their face. As I walk toward them I overhear murmurs of "Are we going to actually be able to fit this?" staring at the "L" shape outlined with masking tape on the concrete floor. They pause for a moment to acknowledge my arrival, only for them to discover my T-shirt inscription. "YOUNG FART" it proclaimed very loudly. Apprehension dissolves to loud outbursts of laughter. I think this might actually be a fun setup.
Free-mo has come a very long way since 1995 when I first launched free-mo.org. The standard was very much in it's infancy. Just a critical few modules were in an operable state and far from complete. I have taken on an assignment about the history of free-mo for an upcoming project. Having been on a Free-mo sebatical of sorts, as of late, has given me a fresher perspective then one that I had just 5 years ago. Further, reading some of the haphazard articles I wrote when I was a mere 18 (half my life ago) has really been a nostalgic activity. I must say that there certainly is a feeling of excitement again for setting up my modules.
|A southbound local passes bridge E8, south of Bloomington, IN on my old n scale layout. I devoted a full thirteen feet to this 'boring' scene. There were no industries, no turnouts, nothing but the field and stream modeled as they actually appeared.|
A southbound local passes bridge E8, south of Bloomington, IN on my old n scale layout. I devoted a full thirteen feet to this 'boring' scene. There were no industries, no turnouts, nothing but the field and stream modeled as they actually appeared.
Of all of the factors that contribute to realism, at the top of the list is scene composition. Scene composition refers to the size, shape, location and distance between elements we put on our layouts. It also refers to which elements we chose to place in a scene. Have you ever been riveted by a cleanly executed architectural model? Even if the model is all white or gray you are drawn in because it is perfectly composed. Such models drive home the impact of getting it right. If you don't get it right, it can be hard to compensate regardless of how well you perform the rest of your efforts.
At the top of the list is the spacing we place between elements. This is where modelers typically put themselves behind the eight ball right out of the box. Given our limited space, obviously there will have to be some compression. However, if you take compression too far and place your elements too close together, your scene suffers.
|(Photos and Modeling by Ron Griffin)|
Scene composition and color treatment are the two largest contributors to realism. That said, basic neatness in your modeling efforts does play a significant role as well, and it’s free. Because they are such visual focal points, extra care with structures particularly pays off. Ron Griffin’s excellent modeling on this engine shed illustrates the point. Notice the clean tight joints at the corners, the invisible seams where parts meet and the perfectly plumb downspouts. There are no globs of glue or melted styrene oozing out. The door frames are flush and squarely aligned. You can accomplish a lot with respect to being neat simply be being aware of it.
|Frisco, Ft. Worth Sub-division modeling by Curt Baker. Photo - Dave Reed|
Scene Composition, Color Material
When building a model railroad we can approach it in one of two ways depending on what we want to accomplish. One option is to create a model as we ‘wished’ the world was, a fantasy world if you will. I would say the majority of the hobby falls in this category and for them, realism isn’t a critical goal and doesn't need to be.
The other approach is for those folks entranced by the way railroading actually is. They want a miniature version of a working railroad. They want to be transported. For this group realism IS critical. The more realistic their efforts, the more powerful the experience, and the more satisfied they are with their efforts.
An excellent Railroad Model Craftsman Magazine article on how Otto M. Vondrak approached designing a Free-mo module set for modeling Hampton Jct. on the DL&W/CNJ. A great read no matter what railroad you model!
This article originally appeared in the December 2008 issue of Railroad Model Craftsman.
A group in San Luis Obispo, CA. has been working on establishing a Railroad Museum (http://www.slorrm.com/) for the last 5 or 10 years. The museum is due to open in the Frieghthouse in San Luis Obispo in October of 2013. They have been working on restoring the freighthouse that was built in 1894. As part of the National Train Day celebration the museum sponsored an event at the freighthouse. Free-mo SLO organized a layout in the freighthouse. We had participants from San Luis, Norcal and LA Free-mo groups. The main room in the freighthouse is about 31 feet by 75 feet. Our layout used a space about 25 feet by 53 feet.
Please "Like" us on Facebook!
Here are links to some video clips taken during the Western Reserve and
Southeast Michigan Free-Mo set-up at the Lodi, Ohio Outlet Mall.
An Amtrak train made up of heritage railroads' passenger cars passes
through Wheatland Junction on the Free-Mo layout set up at the Lodi, OH
Outlet Mall, April 21, 2013.
There was a Free-mo setup at the Western Prototype Modelers Meet in San Bernardino, Calif. on April 13 & 14 2013.
Here is a message and link to a video from Gary green.
I uploaded video I took at the WPM/SB Museum Free-mo setup on April 13 & 14.I decided to try out Vimeo to see how well it works. I think that the conversion of my video from 60i to 30 fps made the video look a bit jumpy. Maybe next time I'll record at 30 fps to see if it makes a difference.
The link will take you to a rail side video of the Free-mo layout at this years WGH setup in Fort Worth, TX. The layout was the combined efforts of the Missouri Valley, Southern Kansas, and North Texas Free-mo groups.